unable to parse option value “0x0” as image size


The problem here is that the options in question were not properly parsed. The values that were passed in should have been the size of the image, not a string of pixels. If you want to know how to format an image as a URL, visit this page.

The problem is that a 0x0 was supposed to be the size of the image, not the size of the option. This is a very common issue that most web development tools have trouble with. This type of error is most commonly caused by the user mistakenly passing something like “0x0” directly into a function, or something like that.

The first thing you should notice is that the default value is 0, which is what you see in every normal url. Most web apps have a default value of 0, but you can see it in these versions. The default value is 0 for a URL, however, and the default value is 16, the default is 33.

The thing is this is not a URL. It’s actually the image size. Some web applications only allow users to pass 0x0 as the first parameter, and the image size is passed as the second parameter. This is why a website like Flickr, for example, has a’max-width’ parameter that specifies the maximum image size that a user can pass in.

I feel like I’m getting attacked a lot, especially in the social media space, by people who are having trouble understanding what I mean. I get a lot of questions like, “Why is the URL 0x0?” or “Why do you have a default size of 0x0 instead of the default 32×32?” I get many “don’t you mean 0?” questions.

Sure there are many people who don’t understand what I mean when I say a URL is 0x0, but if I just say the size of an image I don’t get a lot of questions. For example, I’ve got a very large image that needs to be the size of a tweet. I can’t change it so I just say I’m giving it a default size of 0x0.

How we do it is a little different, but it is what I mean.

The way I’ve been explaining it is that the image is a reference to the original URL, so it just has to be the size of the original URL. It’s a little tricky to explain, but it’s true. There are a lot of things that happen in web design that make it difficult to understand how a URL is actually a reference to something on the page.

But what if you have a URL that is the size of a tweet? That is a little bit trickier. I mean, if you have a tweet that is 1km long, what do you need to do to make it one pixel wide? Well, you need to round it up to the nearest couple of pixels.

If you’re on Twitter and you have a URL that is one pixel wide, you need to round it up to the nearest pixel.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here